Skip to main content

Vision and Perseverance: Lessons from My Hobby of Fiction Writing

Evan Clark ('20)

Since my freshman year of high school, one of my long-term goals has been to write my own series of fiction novels.  As a young child I had mused about wanting to become an author, but I never embarked on a serious attempt to write a book for publication until June 2013, when I began to develop the ideas for my own series.  Five and a half years later, I have created a detailed backstory for the setting of my series, as well as much of the plot and the motivations of the characters.  Yet in spite of all this effort, I have produced little cohesive text to show for my creative endeavors.  I wrote a three hundred page draft prior to 2016, but subsequently changed both my plans for the characters’ trajectories a nd my notion of how the plot should be structured.  For a time I did not write much text of my first novel at all, preferring instead to begin developing a constructed language for one of the cultures in my series.  Last academic year, I wrote a blog post about my efforts to create this very language, a task that is still ongoing.  Eventually, I started writing an updated draft of the first novel that is much more similar to my current plans for the work, but even that draft needs significant changes.
Throughout the time I have spent developing ideas for this series, I have found it incredibly easy to brainstorm new ideas for characters or the plot and to flesh out already existing ideas.  However, I have often had difficulty making the most of opportunities to write.  When I have added to my manuscript, the new material has sometimes poured out in a stream of inspiration.  At other times, I have encountered difficulty in determining where to take the plot and whether or not to change my plans for character development and future chapters. 
Since I began crafting ideas for my novel in 2013, I had the intention of placing its setting several thousand years in the future, on a planet that humans had colonized but that became isolated from the rest of mankind and developed its societies independently.  For several years, I was content with keeping this backstory to my novel, which would not play a large role in the plot of the story.  However, over time I began to ponder whether or not I was constraining my options for material I could place in the novel by setting it in the real universe.  I began to doubt whether my elaborate explanations for why the societies on my fictitious planet had regressed in their technological knowledge would seem realistic to readers.  By last semester, I found myself increasingly toying with the prospect of introducing fantastical elements to my novel, which would necessitate setting the novel in an alternate universe.  While the distinct races of fantastical creatures in J.R.R. Tolkien and George R.R. Martin’s works fascinated me, I never had an urge to incorporate orcs, elves, ogres, or dragons into my novel.  I decided that if I were to include fantastical races in the story, I would do all I could to make them distinct from the typical races in fantasy works, as well as less anthropomorphic.  Ultimately, I determined I would include fantastical elements in the novel, but probably without the presence of non-human intelligent races.  
Out of the fictional novels I have read, I have always been the most drawn to the ones in which the author makes an effort to answer such questions and provides a rich backstory to the characters’ cultures, political systems, and histories.  As I have reflected on efforts to develop the cultural, political, and linguistic background of the societies in the novel’s universe, I have often sought to emulate the depth of worldbuilding that J.R.R. Tolkien invested into his works set in Middle Earth.  Although his worldbuilding detail far outmatches mine, I still intend to evoke the same sense of consistency that Tolkien’s universe exudes.  The fantastical aspects of Middle Earth’s creatures and locations are consistent and normal to the characters of The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings, making the behavior of Tolkien’s characters more believable to readers.  As I go about developing a new draft of my novel that incorporates fantastical elements, I will strive to embed consistency into both the rules governing such fantastical elements and my characters’ interactions with them.
One of the greatest dilemmas I encountered during the process of deciding whether to set the novel in a distant future or in an alternate universe stemmed from the assumption that many readers might not be drawn to the original setting I had in mind for the novel.  While turmoil on an isolated planet several thousand years after its colonization would likely appeal to some readers, I had intended for the technology of the planet’s societies to be nearly equivalent to much of the technology of the early twenty-first century.  For the past few years, I planned to explain this similarity by writing that those societies had reverted to primitive technologies after their colonization and gradually developed their technologies to a level comparable to that of the world today.  I also intended to focus the plot around a struggle for ultimate power between the domineering rulers of major superpowers on my fictitious planet, with the main characters caught in the middle.  I recognized this conception of the plot and my explanation for the characters’ technological knowledge might appeal to some readers.  Still, I began to wonder if adding more fantastical and science fiction elements to the story would allow me to express my intended themes in a way that would appeal to a wider audience.
At the same time, I wanted to avoid the possibility that my desired plot points would be submerged if I shifted the story to a more fantastical or science fiction setting.  I was determined to still use the novel to highlight themes of political leadership, chronic insecurity, lust for power, and the importance of overcoming moral hypocrisy.  Thus, I grappled with the question of whether or not to include characters with psychic abilities and potential quests for the sources of those powers, for I wanted to be sure those additions would not distract from my main themes.  Upon considering these points in depth, I have determined that the best tactic for writing my novel is not to vacillate over whether or not the plot is too political for many readers or whether fantastical elements would distract from the central themes of the novel.  Rather, I have concluded the best strategy for my writing is for me to focus less on how much my novel is similar to a particular genre or theme and more on crafting a unique amalgam of themes.
As I have developed ideas for my novel’s plot and main themes, I have also learned more about my own organizational preferences and how I can better hone my writing abilities.  I wrote my first and second incomplete drafts of the novel according to a loosely delineated plan and often incorporated ideas as they arose in my train of thought.  However, by the time I had written a little less than six chapters of my second draft, I determined that such a writing strategy, while conducive to sudden sparks of inspiration and creativity, was not the approach I needed to keep my draft centered on the themes and plot lines I intended for it. 
As I decided I would need to plan key plot points and character developments for future chapters ahead of time, I took inspiration from what I learned during one of the McConnell Center’s seminars on J.K. Rowling’s approaches to writing.  John Granger, often called the “Dean of Harry Potter Scholars,” told me and my fellow McConnell Scholars about the tremendous detail Rowling devoted to developing her plot points in the Harry Potter series ahead of time.  He added that Rowling established often subtle connections between parallel chapters and novels in the series, tying the series together and accentuating key plot points that mirror each other.  After reflecting on the benefits of this organizational strategy, I decided I would also seek to include subtle connections between parallel chapters and novels in my series.  To this end, I plan to start a third draft of the first novel shortly, incorporating scenes and themes from the second draft while expanding the plot to encompass fantastical elements.  I hope these additions will provide for a more captivating story while maintaining a focus on the political and moral themes I want my series to impart.
Throughout this process, I have gained a greater appreciation of Tolkien’s adage, “Not all those who wander are lost.”  While I have often wandered in my effort to develop the backstory of my budding novel and to write down my ideas, I am not lost, only honing my plans to produce a more compelling series.  I intend to apply the same mindset to other endeavors, such as my search for a graduate studies plan that will prepare me for work in the Civil or Foreign Service of the U.S. State Department, as an international lawyer, or as a Political Science professor.  Although I am currently uncertain as to which of these paths would be best for me, I am determined to investigate these options diligently throughout this semester and the coming academic year.  By keeping my eyes on my key goals, I can find my way through any uncertainty that I may face.  Even though my effort to create a fictional series has been lengthy and is likely to not end any time soon, I am grateful for the lessons it has taught me about the value of vision, perseverance, and adaptability.

Evan Clark, of Owensboro, Ky., is a member of the McConnell Scholar Class of 2020. He studies political science, history and Spanish at the University of Louisville.